Fracking
First thing to say is that I am opposed
to Fracking
I support an unequivocal, point-blank
ban on shale gas exploitation for reasons that I will shortly outline.
I also support a moratorium, but I’m
under no illusion that the moratorium is anything other than a delaying tactic
and not, in itself, opposition to fracking.
Secondly I will read out the Resolution
passed by the National assembly during its Plenary Session on Wednesday the 4th
February
1. Notes that Wales has historically made a substantial
contribution to the UK's energy portfolio.
2. Regrets the provisions within the UK
Government's Infrastructure Bill that will allow fracking companies to drill
beneath Welsh homes without permission from property owners.
3. Believes that energy should be fully devolved to
the National Assembly for Wales and that the Welsh Government should have the
power to block fracking.
4. Calls on the Welsh Government to do everything
within its power to prevent fracking from taking place in Wales until it is
proven to be safe in both an environmental and public health context.
For my part, I consider there are three key
considerations. Firstly, is it safe? Secondly, what will be the community
impact or benefit, and, thirdly, what is the consequence of reliance on another
fossil fuel?
Firstly, I am not convinced that there are no
safety implications. The Environment and Sustainability Committee, which
considered the issue of unconventional gas exploitation in 2012, was also
unconvinced.
Secondly It is bound to effect house prices. Would
I buy a house with fracking taking place, going to take place or having taken
place underneath it.
Of course I would not and without a substantial
reduction in value I do not believe anyone would.
Thirdly, even if we can overcome these issues, I’m
of the view that it would be the gravest of errors to proceed with and develop
any dependency on shale gas as a carbon-emitting fossil fuel. This approach was
supported by the environment committee again in 2012, in paragraph 76 of that
report, when they stated:
‘the Committee considers that the development of
another carbon intensive energy industry at this time is not appropriate and
cannot be reconciled with EU and UK commitments to reduce emissions’.
That was as well as recommending a new and updated
technical advice note to help planning authorities in Wales in dealing with
planning applications for the exploitation and extraction of unconventional
gas.
The House of Commons Select Committee on 21 January
2014 endorsed this view, saying,
‘Any large scale extraction…is…at least 10-15 years
away.’
‘Continually tightening carbon budgets…will have
significantly curtailed our scope for fossil fuel energy, and as a consequence
only a very small fraction of the possible shale gas deposits will be
burnable.’
The report further endorsed this view, supporting
the position of the director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research,
Professor Kevin Anderson, who stated:
‘Emissions from a fully developed UK shale gas
industry would likely be very substantial in their own right. If the UK
Government is to respect its obligations under both the Copenhagen Accord and
Low Carbon Transition Plan, shale gas offers no meaningful potential as even a
transition fuel.
The Welsh Government view as given by Edwina Hart
AM
“Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is an issue that generates
significant public debate and much discussion in this Chamber, and much
discussion across communities in Wales, which are very fearful about the impact
of fracking. That is why we have the precautionary approach to shale gas in
Wales.”
The Welsh Government have introduced controls through the Notification
Direction that will ensure that local planning authorities cannot approve
planning applications where hydraulic fracturing would occur
Unfortunately this does not prevent test drilling
The
scale of these new more intense methods are like nothing we have seen before.
Up until now the largest onshore gas field in the UK, Saltfleetby in
Lincolnshire, had only 8 wells. To produce the same amount of unconventional
gas would require hundreds of wells to be drilled. To temporarily replace just
one offshore North Sea gas field would require thousands of unconventional
wells.
As
well as requiring many more wells these methods also involve much more. Shale
Gas and Oil require massive, slickwater hydraulic fracturing, to be carried out
on every well. Millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are injected
under massive pressure. CBM wells are also often fracked.
These unconventional wells also have much
shorter lifespans, with production from a typical shale well declining by 70 to
80 per cent in the first year alone. This means that large numbers of new wells
need to be constantly drilled to maintain production, even for short periods.
In many areas of the US unconventional gas is already peaking after less than a
decade of exploitation.
Swansea situation
.
Possibly
as concerning as the threat of colossal unchecked carbon emissions is the
direct risk posed to the people and marine life of Swansea.
The
most advanced UCG testing has taken place in Australia where groundwater
contamination has been a major problem in almost all pilot projects (as it has
wherever UCG has been trialled).
In conclusion fracking is unwanted, unnecessary and a threat to not
only our country but through the additional carbon emissions the whole planet