Friday 16 October 2015

Speech at Assembly on Poverty


According to the National Survey for Wales 2014-15, 40 per cent of the people in Wales have some difficulty keeping up with bills. We also know that one in five people in Wales live in relative poverty. Can I put the report in some sort of context? My thanks to Poverty Times, which produced a list of headlines relating to poverty. I’ll run through some of them.
                                                        


Poverty-stricken people forced
‘to plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit’
due to crippling court costs—‘Independent’, August 2015.
Poverty pay—
‘one in four jobs now pay less than the living wage, with almost a THIRD of women on less than £7.65 an hour.’
No, that’s not from the ‘Morning Star’; it’s from the ‘Daily Mail’.
‘Death has become part of Britain’s benefits system. More than 80 people a month are now dying after being declared “fit for work”. The safety net that used to be there for the most vulnerable is being torn to shreds.’—
‘The Guardian’, August 2015.

‘More than six out of 10 parents with a household income of less than £25,000 are struggling to feed their children outside of term time.’—
Northumbria University, Kelloggs report, July 2015.

This is something that affects a number of my constituents: the summer holidays are something that is dreaded by many parents, not because they have to find something for their children to do; they have to find a means of feeding them. We have examples of Faith in the Community, which does a tremendous a job in my constituency, because there would be children who would be going hungry—not not eating at all, but certainly going hungry—if they did not exist.

Zero-hours contracts are offered to a quarter of all unemployed people. The number of people evicted from rented homes has soared since housing benefit cuts began. The key levers for dealing with poverty lie at Westminster. The Westminster Conservative Government has made matters worse with the bedroom tax. This is a tax which fails the two reasons for a tax, which is either to raise money or modify behaviour. It costs rather than raises money, and it cannot modify behaviour because there are no smaller properties for people to move into held by councils and housing associations. As the Westminster Government carry out their commitment regarding tax credits, even more people on low wages will be unable to provide the essentials for themselves and their children.

Poverty in Swansea East is far greater than I would like it to be, and I’m sure far greater than the Minister would like it to be. What’s it caused by? Sanctions by the Department for Work and Pensions. I know a woman who spent several months terrified that she’d have a job interview and have to go to the job centre at the same time: no matter what she did, she would be sanctioned if she failed to make one of those appointments. Zero-hours or low guaranteed hours contracts, normally on the minimum wage—especially low guaranteed hours contracts; we don’t talk about them very often, but lots of companies employ people on a guarantee of one hour a day, which can become 12 or just be one. Cuts to benefits, not the benefits cap, which affects very few people in Swansea East, and the unfair and iniquitous bedroom tax. As I stated earlier, the major levers to reduce poverty, such as benefits, the minimum wage, and macroeconomic policy, rest with Westminster.

I would like to highlight some of the programmes that are helping my constituents. Communities First: I’ve witnessed at first hand practical examples of Communities First programmes that have made a significant difference to the lives of many people, helping people find employment, helping reduce their financial outgoings, helping people improve their health and wellbeing. The Flying Start programme is creating positive outcomes for children. Far too often, children have started school at three two years behind some of their contemporaries and have then tried to reduce the gap over the next eight years. Children think they must be stupid because the child next to them knows things—it’s nothing to do with their innate intelligence; all to do with the opportunity that one child has had and the opportunity that the other child hasn’t had. Flying Start means that children at three should start with development exactly at their chronological age.

The Lift programme: I talked about that yesterday and I think it’s a tremendous opportunity for getting the long-term unemployed into employment. For too many people, unemployment becomes something they expect. They don’t expect to work, none of their family work, and we need to break that cycle. We need to get people to expect to work. We need to get people into employment, because employment is still the best route out of poverty. Although, as somebody who believes in the real living wage—as opposed to the pretend one brought out by the Conservative Government at Westminster—where people are paid enough to actually live on, I would very much like to see all employers in Wales pay the living wage. In fact, Mick Antoniw and myself supported trying to make Wales a living wage country in a statement of opinion just a couple of years ago. I think that really is the key: to get people being paid the living wage.

Unemployment threatens everybody. I look around this room now and a number of people here could well end up unemployed come next May. Remember: it’s not just other people; it could be you.

Friday 9 October 2015

Only one principle Council by election in Wales during September





14 September Welsh by election



Caerphilly, Bedwas, Trethomas & Machen





Party                     2015 votes     2015 share   since 2012
Labour       1,002                   46.8%         -6.8%              -

Plaid Cymru         509        23.8%          +4.6%             

UKIP                     223           10.4%          
 Did not stand

Independent        184                    8.6%           Did not stand

Conservative       119                    5.6%            Did not stand

Independent       106                    4.9%            Did not stand

       -


Friday 2 October 2015

Speech on Public Services in Wales 30 September 2015

This debate takes place when the most extreme Government Britain has ever had is setting out destroying the state provision of services in England. [Interruption.] I want, initially, to address two specific points in the resolution.



Point 2 regrets the Welsh Government’s persistent refusal to provide support to local authorities in preventing rises in council tax. The Welsh block grant, I would say, is the Welsh block grant, but, as that seemed to confuse some of the researchers on the Conservative benches, I’ll try and help them. The Welsh block grant is a fixed sum. If the Welsh Government reduces the rate support grant—and they made up the grant, they made it up by a grant supporting council tax—local authorities would have exactly the same money coming in, just packaged differently, and then spun as a saving, which would be illusory.

Point 3 notes the average band D council tax for Wales for 2015-16 is £1,328, and that households are £546 worse off over the course of the fourth Assembly due to the Welsh Government’s refusal to implement a council tax freeze. The fact that the average band D council tax is higher in England is, of course, ignored. The fact that a large number of Conservative councils in England have not implemented the council tax freeze is also, of course, ignored. The logic of this argument is that there is a desire to reduce local government expenditure by £546 per council tax payer per council.
I now intend to summarise my interpretation of the Conservative party’s policies.

Can I finish my summary, and I will then? You might want to intervene twice. A freeze on council tax, cut the rate support grant in order to support hospital services, directly fund schools and reduce overall education expenditure by ending the central local authority expenditure, and for councils to concentrate on their statutory functions and reduce or end discretionary services. Nick.


Well, actually, I’m glad Labour’s won Surrey, we’re doing really well, but I think the key point, of course, is that local authorities get exactly the same amount of money; it’s just how it’s paid out. Every local authority in Wales could freeze council tax; they just have to cut services. What does this position that I’ve just said about the Conservatives mean in practice? If education central services were removed, the most obvious change would be the end of free school transport. This would need legislation. It would be taking us back to before the 1944 Butler Act. This would disproportionately affect rural areas, Welsh-medium education and denominational schools. The second major area removed would be education consortia, and, whilst removing them may be popular, it would signal the end to all support to schools from outside.
End discretionary services—that’s an easy one, isn’t it? You’re only doing statutory services: that would mean closing all parks, closing all community centres, closing all leisure centres, closing all sports facilities, closing all public toilets, ending bus subsidies—and that’s obviously a number of bus routes—ending economic development by local authorities, ending support for tourism by local authorities and substantially reducing library provision. What the Conservatives appear incapable of understanding is that housing, social services for the elderly, primary care and secondary care are all inter-related. To quote that well-known left-leaning news group, Sky:
‘Bed blocking in NHS hospitals has reached its highest level…amid warnings that a lack of social care is bringing the health service “to its knees”. Every day, doctors and nurses in England are unable to discharge more than 1,000 patients who no longer need treatment because there is no care available for them at home or in the community…Analysis of the latest health statistics by Sky News shows that on one day in September’
2014, just under 5,000
‘patients were unable to be transferred either to other parts of the NHS or into the care of local authorities…That month, 138,068 days of care were lost because of “delayed transfers of care”. At £250 a day for a hospital bed’
that’s £34 million a month looking after patients who no longer need to be there.
More than a quarter of the delays were attributed to a lack of social care funding and that is before the latest set of cuts to local authority expenditure. Poor housing, unavailable sport and exercise opportunities, inadequate primary care and unavailable social care will lead, without any doubt whatsoever, to serious increasing demand and delays in hospital care. The continued attack on local government by the Conservatives is not only unfair and unwarranted, but, if implemented, would have a catastrophic effect on hospital services and the whole of society.
Can I just finish by paying tribute to councillors of all political parties? When I first got elected, I served on the county council with Nigel Evans. I know Lindsay Whittle served as a councillor for 40 years. These people give their time and work incredibly hard for very modest amounts of money. I think we all ought to pay tribute to the work that they do for their community because they care.